One year ago, due to the withdrawal of
the illegal ordinance that prohibited nudity in Las Palmas de Gran
Canaria, the executive secretary of the Federation of entertainment
and restaurants of Canary Islands said that It seems right that
young and pretty people go nude to the beach; but he also said that
It doesn't seem right that old and ugly people go nude to the beach.
He said that vision of naked young people is never inmoral, whereas
vision of old people with flabby meat hanging is inmoral.
I would like to comment on the nonsense
that this man said.
I've always admired children's
spontaneity. Children love their grandparents in spite of the
wrinkled skin, in spite of trembling hands, in spite of drooling
mouth, in spite of slurred speech...
Children see their grandparents as if
they were the most wonderfull persons on Earth. Children's attitude
is quite the opposite to Mister Secretary's attitude. It seems that
when Mr Secretary watches people, he sees seductive bodies or repulsive
bodies. When naturist people see a person, they see just a person,
wether they are nude or clothed people, old or young, tin or fat.
Illegal ordinances of some councils
aim to close human nakedness into ghetos, as if nakedness was
contrary to humanity, as if nakedness hurt people. These ordinances
are driven by ultra-religious and conservative lobbies. These lobbies
infiltrate into councils towns and they try to put the tag "civic"
over a medieval and obscurantist moral. This dark moral borns from
the ignorance and the dogmatism of people that believe in hells and
sins. Ignorance enslaves people and slows their evolution.
We don't need any regulating law.
Common sense allows us to know the best places to enjoy nature on the
way we like. Non written agreements, and landscape's power, make
suitable to choose one or another place.
Freedom allows society to evolve
towards a free and mature comprehension of nakedness; a non forced
nor banned nakedness; a non imposed nor banned clothing. Clothing is
a way of expression. Nakedness is also a way of expression and a way
of relate with nature. People have the natural right of free
expression. A mature nakedness borns from civic attitudes and from an
education inspired in natural values. Ghetos, bills and repression
make impossible any evolution. Society needs to evolve towards
matureness and freedom. Society needs to reconcile with their own
nature. The relation with nature is one of the lost treasures of
human kind.
Some day, human kind will be free. It
will be free from sexual valorations. It will be free from wrong
actions of people who have been educated with repressive pedagogy.
Repressed people are the best customers of pornography and the best
users of promiscuity. People who attack nakedness don't combat
inmorality, they convert the beautifull and innocent reality of human
body into pornography.
In the words of Mr Secretary, we can
discover what many people feel and think about their nudity. Most of
the people have been educated in a repressive way. Tradition and
obscurantism are invisible chains on human mind. We do things just
because we have always done this things; and this things perhaps are
like stones tied to our backs . Many times this stones are
invisibles. We live locked in the invisible jail of our habits
learned, and kidnapping is the worst kind of poverty.
We should not disturb by words like Mr
Secretary's words. This words reveal an invisible mental distortion
that many people suffer; people submerged in a society dominated by
consumist and conservative habits. These habits have been designed
and impulsed by medieval primitive religions. We must know this
prejudices for thinking about strategies that can help society to be
free. These strategies must illuminate the sad and mutilator
education imposed for decades.
The background error of Mr Secretary
is thinking that we are bound to please others with our appearance or
style. It would still be worse thinking that others must change their
style or appearance for liking to the majority of population, and to
be faithful to the fees of the prevailing aesthetic. These are
usually wrongful and artificial canons.
We must be who we truly are. We don't
have to like everybody; but we do need to accept and respect all
people. Freedom is the most important people's treasure. Our image
belongs us; and it has to like ourselves. Everybody must feel good
with their own image. Everybody need to garnish their bodies as they
like. We are not required to change our aesthetic criteria for liking
most people. It is not mandatory that we like style of the other
people; but we must accept the people's right for choosing their
aesthetic line and their way of dressing.
On the other hand, naturist people
don't go to the beach to exhibit themselves. They don't go to the
beach to be watched. They go to the beach to enjoy nature. They go to
the beach to feel good with themselves, to hug wind, water and sun...
with all skin. They go to the beach to get rid of any manufactured
product. They go to the beach to reconnected with the old feelings of
union with nature, to retreat from civilitation.
People who go to the beach without
swimsuits, go there with body they have. This body can be perfect or
imperfect, wrinkled or young, aesthetically commercial or
aesthetically family, and It is always natural. Man or woman who is
in the beach without any clothes, accepts the body he (or she) has,
and he (or she) also accepts the body the others have. They accept
the body the others have, not because Mr Secretary finds it
beautiful, but because he (or she) accepts all the persons. They
accept the body the others have, not because designers of canons
finds it beautiful, but because he (or she) accept all people.
People are the owners of their bodies. Person's bodies, and person's
skins, are natural dresses made by nature. People who dress with
their skin don't do this to impress nor seduce, but to enjoy nature.
An important sector of society closes
the doors to opinions or experiences that deviate from social
normality. It happens due to genetic and cultural reasons. If people
had the courage to try different experiences (experiences that they
don't do so because of a sense of shame or insecurity) they would
discover new brothers and sisters whose names are “Earth”
“Nature” “Sea” “Wind” “Forest”. They would discover
the nature's aesthetic. Nature's aesthetic is very different to
Hollywood's aesthetic. The nature's aesthetic is the aesthetic of the
nature of Homo Sapiens. Nature's aesthetic is the aesthetic of Earth
colours: green forest, blue sea, plumb water of a lake when It rains,
cooper skins under the sun on a southern beach, with the curved lines
that only the universe can invent.
Fetish slaves feel that there are only
some beautiful realities: realities that cause them erection. By
contrast, a lover of nature and nakedness, feels that all that nature
has created is good and pretty: the wrinkled and twisted olive's
trunk, the breasts of an old or young woman, the sincere smile of a
child... everything is pretty and good.
.
.
To my last post:
.
.
.

Good post. Well done.
ReplyDeleteAmen. An article like that deserves an award. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
ReplyDeleteThanks Paul! Thanks Marcus! I'm glad you like it.
ReplyDeleteI will re-post this far and wide, it is what needed to be said.
ReplyDeleteThanks Bruce! I'm happy for your words!
ReplyDelete